Overtime & Calculations
Retained v. Contingent
Are you seeking to identify proficient candidates to support your company's expansion?
Are you experiencing a dynamic employment environment and seeking current insights into the available talent pool?
Are you facing the necessity to replace an outgoing or temporarily absent employee?
Efficient recruitment practices are vital in avoiding the pitfalls of selecting inappropriate services. Allow us to furnish you with an analysis of the two primary recruitment approaches, along with their respective advantages and drawbacks.
Retained Recruitment
The retained search model is ideal for organizations seeking to fill highly specialized, confidential, or critical leadership roles, typically ranging from Director to C-Level positions. This premium service involves close collaboration between companies and a single retained search firm, operating exclusively for the duration of the search or for an agreed-upon minimum "exclusivity" period.
Retained search firms focus primarily on targeting "passive" candidates—those contentedly employed at specific target companies and not actively seeking new opportunities. As a result, the process can span from 90 to 180 days, or even longer compared to searches targeting actively engaged candidates, due to the need to identify and engage prospective passive candidates who may be open to considering new opportunities.
Pros:
-
Exclusive Focus: The retained search model allows for dedicated attention to the client's needs, as the search firm works exclusively with one client at a time. This ensures a deep understanding of the organization's culture, requirements, and objectives.
-
High-Quality Candidates: Retained search firms target passive candidates who are often top performers in their current roles. This focus on quality over quantity can result in a higher caliber of candidates being presented to the client.
-
Confidentiality: Retained search firms prioritize confidentiality, making them suitable for filling sensitive or high-level positions where discretion is crucial.
-
Customized Approach: Clients receive personalized service tailored to their specific requirements, with the search firm providing strategic advice and guidance throughout the hiring process.
Cons:
-
Cost: Retained search services typically come with higher fees compared to contingent searches. The upfront retainer fee and additional costs may be prohibitive for some organizations, especially smaller businesses.
-
Time-Consuming: The retained search process can be lengthy, often taking several months to complete. This extended timeline may not be suitable for organizations with urgent hiring needs.
-
Limited Candidate Pool: Since retained search firms focus primarily on passive candidates, the pool of potential applicants may be smaller compared to other recruitment methods. This could result in a longer search process or challenges in finding the ideal candidate.
-
Risk of Unsuccessful Outcome: Despite the exclusive focus and personalized approach, there is still a risk that the retained search may not yield the desired results. If the hired candidate does not meet expectations or leaves shortly after joining the organization, it can be costly and time-consuming to restart the search process.
Contigent Recruitment
The contingent search model specializes in sourcing for specialized, hard-to-fill roles ranging from individual contributors to mid-tier management positions, typically below the Director or VP level.
Organizations commonly collaborate with multiple contingent search firms under this model, each presenting multiple candidate resumes for client review, aiming for swift placement. Moreover, as contingent firms maintain non-exclusive relationships with clients, their recruiters may present the same candidate to multiple clients, including potential competitors. Clients who promptly express interest and make swift decisions often secure the top candidates available.
Pros:
-
No Upfront Costs: Contingent search firms typically operate on a "no win, no fee" basis, meaning clients only pay for successful placements. This makes it a low-risk option for organizations with limited budget resources.
-
Wide Candidate Pool: Contingent search firms often have access to a large network of candidates, including both active job seekers and passive candidates. This can result in a diverse pool of potential applicants for the client to consider.
-
Speed: Contingent searches can be completed relatively quickly, as multiple firms may simultaneously work on filling the same position. This agility is beneficial for organizations with urgent hiring needs.
-
Competitive Pricing: Since contingent search firms compete with each other to fill the same position, clients may benefit from competitive pricing and negotiations on fees.
Cons:
-
Lack of Exclusivity: Contingent search firms operate on a non-exclusive basis, meaning they may not dedicate as much time and resources to any single client compared to retained search firms. This could result in a less thorough search process or a lower quality of service.
-
Limited Commitment: Without an exclusive relationship with the client, contingent search firms may prioritize other clients or projects over the search, leading to delays or reduced attention to the client's needs.
-
Quality of Candidates: While contingent search firms have access to a wide pool of candidates, the quality of those candidates may vary. Some candidates may be less qualified or less suitable for the position compared to those sourced through other methods.
-
Potential Conflicts of Interest: Contingent search firms may submit the same candidate to multiple clients, including direct competitors. This can create conflicts of interest and may not align with the client's preference for exclusivity or confidentiality.
The content presented on this page reflects the collective professional experiences of HR Solutions & Partners. It is imperative to note that the information provided does not constitute legal or HR advice to the reader in any capacity. HR Solutions & Partners assume no responsibility or liability for any decisions or actions undertaken by the reader based on the content presented on this website.